Which linux mint should i choose




















However, it prefers the traditional desktop metaphor conventions. GNOME has always been one of the leading powerhouses in the desktop environment.

However, not all are satisfied with it. GNOME 2 was a major success that followed the traditional desktop. In fact, it created a major controversy in the community. GNOME 3 targets a more modern and stylish look with a lot of tweaks and changes over the previous one. For addressing the situation, the Mint devs forked GNOME and some of its core features and tweaked it heavily to meet the traditional metaphors.

From , Cinnamon desktop started its journey. MATE desktop is free, open-source and available for a wider range of Linux distros. More than 20 distros officially support MATE. The goal is to maintain the GNOME 2 code base, frameworks, and core apps to offer the traditional metaphors to the Linux lovers.

There are some core features that all desktop environments try to fulfill while offering additional features. However, over the course of time, both have their own software collections and adoptions. For any desktop environment, this is the most important part. The way it looks, the way it behaves, the way things are arranged — every single factor is guaranteed to impact your experience.

File managers are one of the most important software of all desktop systems in the world. Linux Mint Cinnamon features Nemo file manager. Linux Mint and Ubuntu, both the distros, will have the same gaming experiences. However, as Linux Mint consumes fewer resources, running various games will give a bit more performance than Ubuntu.

On the other hand, Ubuntu is an excellent choice for modern hardware so that gaming performance will be increased on Ubuntu with fewer compatibility issues. Finally, I can only say that gaming experiences will be more or less the same in both systems. If we discuss the community support, then Ubuntu remains a long ahead of Linux Mint.

Ubuntu is backed up and developed by a large corporate company called Canonical and has a huge fan base and community-driven support teams worldwide. Linux Mint also does not lag. Many community groups worldwide and a group of companies using Linux Mint also act as partners, donors, or sponsors for its development.

As a new user, I recommend using both of them and finding out which one fits your desire and needs. Linux Mint and Ubuntu are very popular in the Linux community and offer a wide range of software compatibility. If you are an MS Windows user, then go for Linux Mint, which will give you a known desktop environment to play with but if you are a tech-savvy guy, stick with Ubuntu, as it provides a stunning and sleek system for your latest hardware.

Is Ubuntu is better than Linux Mint or vice versa? What do you think? Let us know your suggestions, experiences, and opinions in the comment below. I am with you there.

Similar with upgrade experiences from UbuntuGnome Long Live Linux! I always come back to Ubuntu. The Reason? Because as with all of Linux sooner or later getting through the day comes down to a highly esoteric question that needs to be answered. You missed the 16th fact, which is the one that changed my choice: Ubuntu has unfortunately in my mind decided to use snap for some updates.

Mint, which feeds off Ubuntu rather than Debian directly, has no plans to support snap. They admit that when some package is updated via snap, they will not be able to update. Thus, as the months go by, Mint will be increasingly left in the dustbin of running old code. One wonders when Mint will become so constrained by this deficiency that it will be completely useless.

Is Linux safe to use just like a windows or mac machine? Ecommerce and banking. Was thinking of trying linux mint. Linux is hands down safer than Windows or Macs. Having such a small market share decreases the probability of malware attacks, and being open source, there are thousands of eyes looking out for vulnerabilities.

Yes and no. Yes: Linux is safer because nearly no one targets it. The notion that open source by itself is better or safer two distinct metrics by the nature of the number of contributors is a myth that is best clobbered sooner than later. More often than not, I struggle with software laboring from poor design decisions that are the result of a committee approach, a committee mindset, and committee vagaries.

Well, thanks u for your review. Yeah, I think both of them are very nice, but I have an other option in Linux Mint. Not only Linux Mint but also Ubuntu and the whole Ubuntu-based.

This is only my optional idea help you to make your post better if it is true. By the way, thank u for your post that I can exactly how to know what operating system I need. Hope you have a good day! I have always been a Windows user since xp in I loved it then, still do now 13 years later. Never could get it out of my head that Windows was meant to grow with me, and I started associating the best jobs a computer could do with Windows operating systems.

I was introduced to the internet with it as a gold standard, which is why, when Windows 7 came out, and I heard about how it replaced Vista and the problems it had, I wanted in right away.

Windows 7 impressed me because of the search tool in the start menu, however my first dislike of Windows came with 7 in regards to user account control and the new control panel format. It was then and there that I had to accept swallowing a hard pill, and that is, Microsoft is trying to decide what works best for me.

Honestly the worst experience I had with 64bit architecture was in Windows 7 because everything would randomly disconnect. This is still the case today, and as a beta tester for Windows 10, resetting your DNS manually via command prompt became a daily occurrence just to reconnect to your Wifi and internet sites properly among other things.

Forcing you to use troubleshooting wizards on a regular basis, was the first indication for me that no Windows is not the gold standard what so ever. But neither is Mac OSX. The problem with Mac is, everything Apple is restrictive by nature and when I discovered Mac, it was around the same time I discovered Linux.

To this day I have a love hate relationship with the permissions system of Linux coming from Windows, where things are at least on the file management side of things, a little more intuitive if not relatively similar.

Things are a lot better on Linux now than they were even 10 years ago. It was then and there I knew without a doubt, my days with Windows are permanently over and what a relief it is now for me to say that.

Some things Windows does better, like large file transfers, but in Linux, installing a better file manager fixes this out of the box. I have little experience with Mac, but I would recommend it over Windows any day especialy if you buy into IOS, the benefits of sync definitely are worth it however the draw back is non Mac software compatibility.

After all, a tool is only as good as its creation and how it is used outside of its native environment by its practical and unconventional characteristics driving the way forward. I want to experiment with Fedora, Arch and other Linux families, but I will always call Mint home for a reason. It works the way a computer is designed to, making you the user, front and center with whatever you want to use it for. Of course you don't go running to 3rd party driver aggregates in the hopes that they don't fill things with malware.

Hey mate. Thanks for effort and time. I appreciate. In search for decent operating system after I realised win 10 many unlogical things, wierd preinstalled apps, in general is putting user on last place. And yes there you mentioned point I could not reach. That supposed to work how computer is designed to work! Thank you and have a good day. I was an avid Windows fan since Win 3. I had, over the years, played with Linux but found it had too many issues for me to bother with as a serious OS.

That changed with Win 10, as it appeared Linux, at that point, was so much better. Thank you for sharing your expirience. Best regards. Comparing distros in Linux boils down to personal opinion and desires. Ubuntu just works. No mandatory updates during boot. Amazingly fast boot times. Seamless backup systems. I could go on forever or nearly. I find that I prefer linux mint over ubuntu. The main reason is that it is simpler for me when it comes to the installation of things like printers. Bluetooth and sound cards seem to work right out of the box too.

For some reason I just prefer the look of the mint desktop as well. I agree. For one, I never liked the default DE in Ubuntu, and yes, it was nice to install a bunch of them, but I ran into more problems with Ubuntu than I did in Mint I used Xubuntu from until if I remember well , and I think that Mint has a lot of really useful tools incorporated in it.

System still runs very smoothly and with very little clutter. Driver management is quite good, too. And again, I really hate the default DE in Ubuntu, I never liked how empty and impractical it was compared to a more normal desktop where everything is close at hand and where the screen estate is used efficiently. I still run a baskc version of Ubuntu on one of my old laptops, as a web server with nothing else installed on it. But I hate how things are placed on the desktop.

I know I can change DE or cutomize, but… This is a server. But anyway, to each their own. Ubuntu is a good OS. Nitish, this is the best article on the net regarding the difference between the two systems. A big thank and job very well done!! I agree: well done. I only wish you had written this article before I fully switched to Linux and Mint Otherwise: thanks! Your choice! But you can switch to SystemD anytime you boot up — if you want.

Talk about versatility. No other distro I can recall does that. Just the way I like it. I can easily get to MB RAM usage at startup depending on what auto-start services I want from the default installation.

Superficial, yes. Thank you very much! You have helped me to decide by Linux Mint Mate. I started reading, but the repeated grammar errors with plural vs singular disagreements were too annoying for me to continue. Thanks for the pictures, though. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Sign in. Forgot your password? Get help. Privacy Policy. Password recovery. Home Beginner's Guide. Linux Mint Cinnamon Vs. MATE: which one to choose?

By Nitish. September 18, Updated: September 18, Related Articles. I thirdly agree Enson Nitish. Thanks for that nice review! Saves me time to also test the mate! Best wishes! Comment: Please enter your comment! Latest Articles.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000